Click here
for Elementary Matrix
Excerpt from THE REVISED SCHOOL
CODE
Section 1531 (4) of the
The People of the State of Michigan enact: (4) Except as otherwise provided in this act,
the superintendent of public instruction shall only issue a teaching
certificate to a person who has met the elementary or secondary, as applicable,
reading credit requirements established under superintendent of public
instruction rule. If a person holds a teaching certificate, then beginning July 1, 2007, notwithstanding
any rule to the contrary, the superintendent of public instruction shall not
renew the person's provisional teaching certificate or advance the person's
certification to professional certification unless the person, during the first
6 years of his or her employment in classroom teaching, successfully completes at least a 3-credit course of
study with appropriate field experiences in the diagnosis and remediation
of reading disabilities and differentiated instruction. To meet this
requirement, the course of study should include the following elements, as
determined by the department to be appropriate for the person's certification
level and endorsements: interest inventories, English language learning
screening, visual and auditory discrimination tools, language expression and
processing screening, phonemics, phonics, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension,
spelling and writing assessment tools, and instructional strategies.
All Provisionally
Certified Teachers
(As of
The course syllabi
must be submitted electronically for this review.
Submitted
by:___Nancy G. Patterson, PhD Contact
information: email:_patterna@gvsu.edu
phone: __________________
Institution
Name;
(course number(s) and title(s))
Address: _920
Certification
Level (Circle appropriate level(s))
Secondary
Please include the institution name and contact
person on each page of the response matrix.
The
teacher preparation institution must complete a reflective review of the
required minimum 3 credit course of study which must be available in a single three credit course and may be offered across several
courses (equal to a minimum of 3 credits).
The teacher preparation institution will not make this required 3
credit course of study a reason to require a masters program of teachers. |
|||
Assessment, Instruction and
Field Experiences for the following areas: Possible
Focus Question (s) |
Examples
of How Standard can be met (Teaching/Learning Experiences) |
Assessment/Evidence
of Elements Learned and Applied |
|
Elementary
Certification |
Secondary
Certification |
||
Interest Inventories What
motivates students? How can teachers
engage students for learning? |
|
Candidates
learn how to create written and oral inventories. Inventories appropriate for students,
parents are discussed. Learn
techniques for open / closed survey results and what is gained from
each. Surveys include both reading and
writing. |
Candidates
develop a student survey in class based on information they seek to gather.
Surveys are administered, analyzed and results summarized in the case study
completed for course work. Survey
information should be used when planning instruction for the case study. |
Visual and auditory
discrimination How can
teachers help students learn who see or hear language in diverse ways? |
|
Candidates
demonstrate proficiency in understanding visual & auditory acuity &
perception. They learn to administer
the “E test” and the Amsler grid test (visual). Check lists for visual and auditory
discrimination are developed. Connections to phonemic awareness and phonics
are developed. Modeling, and practice
with strategies to work with diverse students having visual & auditory
acuity & perception problems are completed. |
Candidates
are to administer, assess, and use information from visual/auditory
assessment tools in their case study students. |
Language expression and
processing screening How can
teachers help students who express and process language in diverse ways? |
|
Speech
articulation, voice, fluency, and language patterns are developed. Oral language developmental levels are
learned. The connection to phonemic
awareness is made. Language
differences in varied ethnic groups are discussed (Spanish and African
American vernacular English).
Candidates examine ways to instruct these students. |
Candidates
assess student(s) for the case study using observation forms, & anecdotal
notes. Information is presented in the
case study report. |
English language learning How can
teachers help students learn whose first language is not English? |
|
Articles
from various journals will be read that discuss assessment and instruction
techniques for ELL students. Classroom
assessment tools (SOLOM, checklists) and the state ELPA assessment will be
taught. The concept of CALC and BIC will be developed so candidates
understand the two types of assessments |
Candidates
use information from the course readings when planning lessons. They take 2 of the lessons used in the
demonstration lessons and reflect on how the lesson would change if classroom
students were not ELL. If there are
ELL student, then lesson reflections will describe how ELL instructional
techniques were utilized. |
Phonemics, phonics, fluency How can
teachers help students who have not yet learned basic word recognitions
skills? How and when should teachers
refer students to specialists when they observe problems with language and
fluency? |
|
Candidates
develop an understanding of phonemics, phonics and fluency. They learn how to assess for fluency
through the administration of a miscue analysis. Candidates will practice giving a miscue
analysis in class and then give it to three secondary students. Instructional methods for working with
secondary students who have difficulty in phonemics, phonics, and fluency
will be discussed and modeled in class. |
Candidates
complete the miscue analysis on three students. The outcomes are included in the case
study. The outcomes are used to guide
instruction. In lesson reflections,
the candidates explain how the lesson met the needs of the learner and used
varied modalities/learning styles. |
Vocabulary How can
teachers help students learn the language of the content areas? |
|
Vocabulary
assessments (informal) are reviewed.
Candidates create a vocabulary assessment tool for a content area
text. Strategies useful with
struggling readers are discussed in small groups and presented to the class. |
Candidates
complete three Literacy Event Reports that document their use of strategies
in the classroom and an analysis of that use.
These strategies will include at least one vocabulary strategy.
Candidates will use the information from the literacy event to inform their
teaching. Reflections are completed
on the literacy event and candidates will include in that reflection how they
evaluate student learning. |
Comprehension How can
teachers help students comprehend what they are learning? |
|
Various comprehension assessment tools are analyzed for usefulness, underlying theory, and approach to comprehension. Various strategies that support meaning-making (pre-, during-, and post-reading) and assessments (questioning, retelling, cloze) are introduced and practiced. Strategies are based on those most useful for struggling readers. Candidates learn how to adjust comprehension strategies to meet the modality/learning style/ and physical needs of the student. |
Candidates administer a cloze assessment as well as a miscue analysis that utilizes Retelling. The analysis is written in the case study. Information from literacy event reports is utilized during teaching and other assessment tools are utilized while instructing (candidates learn that many strategies are also assessment tools). Candidates reflect on instruction for development of the demonstration lesson. |
Spelling, writing What
specific symbol sound knowledge do students need to become independent
writers? How can teachers help
students improve their writing and spelling? |
|
Candidates develop a thorough understanding of spelling and writing developmental stages. Spelling as connected to phonics and phonemic awareness is the bases of the developmental stages. Candidates experience various approaches to the concept of writing as a process and how the revising and editing stages of the process can be a space for students to stretch their lexicon and their spelling abilities. Writing assessment tools include rubrics, teacher and student response, and self-response. Candidates compare assessment tools for usefulness as well as genres specific to content areas. Candidates learn about a variety of instructional strategies useful for struggling readers/writers. Candidates will bring in samples of student work and in small groups analyze them. and discussing instructional strategies that could be used with students. |
Candidates assess, analyze, and use spelling and writing in the literacy event and the case study, as well as the lesson demonstration. The case study analysis section will contain information. Literacy Event reflections will include information on the instructional approaches utilized and any changes that may be needed. |
Instructional strategies How can
teachers implement instructional strategies that help students develop
learning strategies? |
|
Throughout the course candidates learn a variety of instructional strategies, how to alter the strategy to meet the needs of students, how to differentiate instruction in the classroom to meet needs of learners. |
The Literacy Event will provide candidates with practice utilizing a variety of instructional strategies (including technology based strategies), reflect on the outcomes and make alterations to instruction based on reflection/assessment. The demonstration lesson will allow for peer feedback. |
Assessment strategies How can
teachers assess students in formal and informal ways that promote
instruction? |
|
Candidates learn about a variety of assessments in all areas described above. Assessments include formal and informal methods. |
The Literacy Event and the Demonstration Lesson, as well as the Case Study project all document the use of the assessment strategies. |
The law
also mandates that teachers need to apply
“appropriate field experiences” in light of these topics. As a result, learners will need to
demonstrate appropriate application of these topics in a classroom setting. |
|
|
In this course, candidates work with their own students in their own classroom. They submit three Literacy Event Reports that document the use of strategies (for comprehension and assessment), a case study of three students that includes a miscue analysis, a writing sample, a review of standardized test performance, a literacy biography of each student in the case study, a cloze test, and information related to the various strategies and assessments used during the candidate’s school day. In addition, candidates will create and present a detailed lesson that includes comprehension and assessment strategies to the class and get feedback from the class on the elements of that lesson. Included in that demonstration will be an analysis of the theory and research that grounds the strategies, and a reflection on the relationship between theory and classroom practice, a report on how the lesson could be modified for diverse learners. |